Thornton v. McNeely.
This text of 57 S.E. 400 (Thornton v. McNeely.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action of trespass, which seems to have been tried, without final result, several times in the Superior Court of McDowell County. It was finally tried and determined upon a consent reference by Clyde R. Hoey, Esq., and comes to this Court upon exceptions to the judgment of his Honor, Judge Guión, confirming the report of the referee. The'matters involved are largely questions of locating boundaries and are principally questions of fact. His Honor, after consideration, has adopted the findings of fact of the referee, and, while the evidence appears to be conflicting, there is evidence to support such findings, which are therefore binding upon us. In his conclusions of law, based on such findings, we are unable to discover any error, and therefore the judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 S.E. 400, 144 N.C. 622, 1907 N.C. LEXIS 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thornton-v-mcneely-nc-1907.