Thornton v. Jett
This text of 1 Va. 138 (Thornton v. Jett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Whether the action was sustainable or not, it is unnecessary for the court now to decide — the plaintiff having submitted to the nonsuit, which he was not bound to do, he has deserted his cause, and therefore, he cannot now avail himself of an objection to the opinion of the court, in awarding it — the writ of su-persedeas must be quashed.
*As to the costs, the court (except the President) were of opinion, that the assumpsit being laid to the plaintiffs themselves, they ought to pay the costs.
The PRESIDENT said, that ihe reason why executors pay no costs, is, that the3r are in pursuit of their duty; and therefore he could see no reason, why this case should be distinguished from others, where the action is brought upon an assumpsit to the testator. _
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Va. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thornton-v-jett-vactapp-1792.