Thornton v. Graham

137 S.E. 568, 36 Ga. App. 581, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 158
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 8, 1927
Docket17791
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 568 (Thornton v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thornton v. Graham, 137 S.E. 568, 36 Ga. App. 581, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

This case is controlled by the ruling in Singer Mfg. Co. v. Walker, 77 Ga. 649, which is as follows: “Where a case was tried before a justice of the peace, and from the judgment rendered by him the defendant appealed to a jury in that court, if, upon the call of the ease for trial upon the appeal, the defendant did not appear, it was error for the justice for that reason to dismiss the appeal. An appeal is a de novo investigation, and should not be dismissed because of the absence of the defendant.” See also Davenport v. Puett, 4 Ga. App. 83 (60 S. E. 1031).

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Walker & Co.
77 Ga. 649 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1886)
Davenport v. Puett
60 S.E. 1031 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E. 568, 36 Ga. App. 581, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thornton-v-graham-gactapp-1927.