Thornton v. Graham

137 S.E. 568, 36 Ga. App. 581, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 158
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 8, 1927·No. 17791·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

This case is controlled by the ruling in Singer Mfg. Co. v. Walker, 77 Ga. 649, which is as follows: “Where a case was tried before a justice of the peace, and from the judgment rendered by him the defendant appealed to a jury in that court, if, upon the call of the ease for trial upon the appeal, the defendant did not appear, it was error for the justice for that reason to dismiss the appeal. An appeal is a de novo investigation, and should not be dismissed because of the absence of the defendant.” See also Davenport v. Puett, 4 Ga. App. 83 (60 S. E. 1031).

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thornton v. Graham, 137 S.E. 568, 36 Ga. App. 581, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

137 S.E. 568 (Thornton v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Walker & Co.
77 Ga. 649 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1886)
Davenport v. Puett
60 S.E. 1031 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)