Thornton v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Thornton v. Division of Employment Security

310 S.W.3d 294, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 584, 2010 WL 1849333

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 2010·No. WD 71141·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn Thornton appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that Thornton was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. On appeal, Thornton claims that the Commission misapplied the law and that its finding was not supported by competent and substantial evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Carolyn Thornton appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found that Thornton was discharged for misconduct connected with work and was, therefore, disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. On appeal, Thornton claims that the Commission misapplied the law and that its finding was not supported by competent and substantial evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Thornton v. Division of Employment Security, 310 S.W.3d 294, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 584, 2010 WL 1849333 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

310 S.W.3d 294 (Thornton v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.