Thornton v. Caldwell
23 F. Cas. 1146, 1 Cranch 524
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1808
StatusPublished
This text of 23 F. Cas. 1146 (Thornton v. Caldwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thornton v. Caldwell, 23 F. Cas. 1146, 1 Cranch 524 (circtddc 1808).
Opinion
(having some doubts) admitted the testimony as competent evidence to the jury, not because the notary’s book had any peculiar authority or validity; but because it appeared to be the best evidence which under such circumstances could be expected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 F. Cas. 1146, 1 Cranch 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thornton-v-caldwell-circtddc-1808.