Thornton v. Benninghoven

Nebraska Supreme Court

Thornton v. Benninghoven

230 N.W. 958, 119 Neb. 879, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 146

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided April 18, 1930·No. No. 27002·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover damages upon two causes of action, one for false imprisonment and one for malicious prosecution. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the district court sustained motions to dismiss made by defendants, and plaintiff has appealed.

[880]*880We have carefully examined the record and find the same to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover damages upon two causes of action, one for false imprisonment and one for malicious prosecution. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the district court sustained motions to dismiss made by defendants, and plaintiff has appealed.

[880]*880We have carefully examined the record and find the same to be free from prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is therefore

Affirmed.

Thornton v. Benninghoven, 230 N.W. 958, 119 Neb. 879, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 146 (Neb. 1930).

Pincite

230 N.W. 958 (Thornton v. Benninghoven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.