Thornton, Tamme v. Thomas Beachler, Michael Beachler, Phyllis G. Beachler, and Elizabeth Kaye Farmer

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 13, 2002
• Docket: 01-02-00078-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 13, 2002

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-02-00078-CV

TAMME THORNTON, Appellant

V.

THOMAS BEACHLER, MICHAEL BEACHLER, PHYLLIS BEACHLER, AND ELIZABETH KAYE FARMER, Appellees

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 308,377

O P I N I O N

We received a letter from the mediator on March 26, 2002, stating that the parties had settled, subject to the approval of an agreement. Because no motion to dismiss was filed, on May 2, 2002, the Court issued an order stating that unless, within 30 days of the date of the order, the parties to the appeal demonstrated that there was a live controversy between them as to the merits of this appeal, the appeal would be dismissed. See Hallmark Personnel of Texas, Inc. v. Franks, 562 S.W.2d 933, 935 (Tex. App. -Houston [1st Dist.] 1978, no writ) (existence of actual controversy is essential to exercise of appellate jurisdiction).

In response to that order, appellees have filed a motion to dismiss. That motion contains a certificate of service on attorney for appellant. More than 10 days has elapsed, and appellant has filed no objection to the motion.

Accordingly, the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hedges, Nuchia, and Jennings.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.