Thornton-Bey v. Administrative Office of the US Courts

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedMay 21, 2009
DocketCivil Action No. 2009-0958
StatusPublished

This text of Thornton-Bey v. Administrative Office of the US Courts (Thornton-Bey v. Administrative Office of the US Courts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thornton-Bey v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, (D.D.C. 2009).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAY 21 2009 DeJuan B. Thornton-Bey, ) Clerk, U.S. District and ) Bankruptcy Courts Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. O~ U958 ) Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and application

to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be

dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (requiring dismissal of a prisoner's complaint upon a

determination that the complaint, among other grounds, fails to state a claim upon which relief

can be granted).

Plaintiff is a prisoner at the United States Penitentiary in Florence, Colorado, suing the

Administrative Office of the United States Courts ("A.O.") for the release of a document

pursuant to the Freedom oflnformation Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552. The FOIA applies only to

executive-branch agencies of the United States. See 5 U.S.C. § 552(f) (defining agency as

"defined in section 551(1)," which specifically excludes "the courts of the United States"). The

A.O. is part ofthe judicial branch of the federal government. See 28 U.S.C. § 601 ("Director and

a Deputy Director [are] appointed and subject to removal by the Chief Justice of the United

States, after consulting with the Judicial Conference."). The complaint therefore fails to state a

claim upon which relief can be granted. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this

Memorandum Opinion.

ka4--- Date: May + 2009 istrict Judge

ttl'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thornton-Bey v. Administrative Office of the US Courts, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thornton-bey-v-administrative-office-of-the-us-cou-dcd-2009.