Thornley v. Flemming

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 20, 2004
• Docket: 04-6604
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6604

PERRY E. THORNLEY, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RUFFUS FLEMMING, Regional Director; HINCKLE, Chief Warden GRCC; DUGGER, Corporal, Corrections Officer, GRCC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-419-3)

Submitted: May 13, 2004 Decided: May 20, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Perry E. Thornley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Perry E. Thornley, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.* We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate

judge. See Thornley v. Flemming, No. CA-03-419-3 (E.D. Va.

Mar. 25, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

- 2 -