Thornley v. Flemming

96 F. App'x 922

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Perry E. Thornley, Jr., appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.

Footnotes

•

* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Thornley v. Flemming, No. CA-03-419-3 (E.D.Va. Mar. 25, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).