Thorner v. Stone

260 N.E.2d 172, 357 Mass. 782
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided June 11, 1970·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The defendant appeals from an order of the Appellate Division of the Northern District dismissing a report. The action was brought in the District Court of Newton to recover a portion of the real estate taxes under a written lease and to recover an attorney’s fee in enforcing obligations under the lease. As the Appellate Division noted, “The [t]rial [j]udge apparently took the position that there was no ambiguous language in the lease” and concluded that the base figure should be the tax as abated and actually paid. The Appellate Division agreed with the judge’s determination but concluded that “the language . . . required clarification and that such clarification was provided by consideration of the subsequent conduct of the parties.” In either [783]*783event, we are satisfied that the defendant’s tax liability under the lease is based on the tax as abated. In view of this conclusion the plaintiff is entitled to an attorney’s fee in enforcing obligations under the lease by virtue of the express provision therein.

Leo Gordon for the defendant. Alton L. Horte, Jr., for the plaintiff.

Order dismissing report affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thorner v. Stone, 260 N.E.2d 172, 357 Mass. 782 (Mass. 1970).

260 N.E.2d 172 (Thorner v. Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CRJ Investments v. Feeney (In re Dorand, Inc.)
21 B.R. 59 (D. Massachusetts, 1982)
George H. Dean Co. v. Pappas
430 N.E.2d 836 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1982)
Yaffe v. S. S. Pierce Co.
338 N.E.2d 358 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1975)