Thorne v. Zoning Board of Appeals

222 A.2d 809, 154 Conn. 718
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 21, 1966·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The motion by the plaintiffs for a review of the decision concerning the correction of the record in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford is remanded to the trial court with direction that the trial judge hold a hearing on the plaintiffs’ motion to correct the record and to add to the finding such claims of law, if any, as were properly made but were not included in the finding. See Practice Book § 223.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thorne v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 222 A.2d 809, 154 Conn. 718 (Colo. 1966).

222 A.2d 809 (Thorne v. Zoning Board of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Dukes
255 A.2d 614 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1969)