Thorne v. Tory Burch LLC

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 30, 2020
Docket1:19-cv-10403
StatusUnknown

This text of Thorne v. Tory Burch LLC (Thorne v. Tory Burch LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thorne v. Tory Burch LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Opinion

e Vet eee Morgan Lewis USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC eo Michael F. Fleming DATE FILED: 1/30/2020 Associate Peet mene Ghee te +1.212,309.6207 michael.fleming@morganlewis.com January 30, 2020 VIA ECF Hon. Stewart D. Aaron United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 11C New York, New York 10007 Re: Thorne v. Tory Burch LLC, Case No. 19-cv-10403-JPO-SDA Dear Judge Aaron: We represent defendant Tory Burch LLC (“Defendant”) in the above-referenced action pending before the Court. Pursuant to Rules I1(D) and II(A) and (B) of Your Honor’s Individual Practices and Rule 37.2 of the Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, we write jointly with counsel for Plaintiff Braulio Thorne (“Plaintiff”), respectfully to request that the Court adjourn the Initial Conference scheduled for February 10, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. to a date and time after the disposition of Defendant’s motion to dismiss, which was filed on January 28, 2020, and to stay discovery during the pendency of Defendant’s motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). The parties have conferred in good faith and jointly request a stay of discovery. In support of this request, counsel for the parties state that Defendant’s motion may be wholly dispositive of the claims at issue in this action or may affect the scope of discovery if the claims are not dismissed. Accordingly, counsel for the parties submits that an adjournment of the Initial Conference and stay of discovery during the pendency of Defendant's motion would conserve both the Court's and the parties’ resources. See Farzan v. Bridgewater Assocs., LP, 699 Fed. Appx. 57, 58 (2d Cir. 2017) (affirming district court’s exercise of discretion to stay discovery during pendency of motion to dismiss). We thank the Court in advance for its consideration of these requests.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 101 Park Avenue _ New York, NY 10178-0060 @ +1.212.309.6000 United States @ +1.212.309.6001

Hon. Stewart D. Aaron January 30, 2020 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, /5/ Michael F. Fleming Michael F. Fleming Cc: All Counsel of Record (Via ECF)

Application GRANTED. Within seven days of the Court's decision on Defendant's motion to dismiss, if any claims remain in this action, the parties shall file a joint letter proposing dates for an Initial Pretrial Conference. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 30, 2020 cf 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farzan v. Bridgewater Associates, LP
699 F. App'x 57 (Second Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Thorne v. Tory Burch LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thorne-v-tory-burch-llc-nysd-2020.