Thorne v. Hilliker

12 Mich. 215
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 8, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 12 Mich. 215 (Thorne v. Hilliker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thorne v. Hilliker, 12 Mich. 215 (Mich. 1864).

Opinion

Campbell J.:

In this case the commissioner’s report, stating the amount due on a mortgage, shows that the principal was not due until after the bill was filed, and that no interest was then unpaid, the interest accruing up to that time being stated to have been paid. Complainant did not except to this report, nor did he object to it; but allowed it to stand as the foundation of his claim to a decree. He can not now, by evidence, or by asking this Court to inspect the documents, rid himself of the effect of this action. He is bound by the report which he has adopted, and the defendant has a right to rely upon it.

There was therefore no cause of action when the bill was ■ filed. The decree must be reversed, and the bill be dismissed, with costs of both courts as far as the appellant is concerned.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eaton v. Truesdail
40 Mich. 8 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1879)
Slater v. Breese
36 Mich. 77 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Mich. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thorne-v-hilliker-mich-1864.