Thorne v. Hale

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2010·No. 092305·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2305

WILLIAM G. THORNE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

KELLY HALE, Director; RAPPAHANNOCK AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD; SHARON GILLIAN, Drug Court Director,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00601-JCC-TRJ)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 19, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William G. Thorne, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, COOK, KITTS & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William G. Thorne appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2006) claims against them. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order. See Thorne v. Hale, No. 1:08-cv-00601-

JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 29, 2009; entered Oct. 30, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thorne v. Hale, (4th Cir. 2010).

Thorne v. Hale (Thorne v. Hale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related