Thorne v. F. C. Johnson Co.

111 A. 410, 119 Me. 598, 1920 Me. LEXIS 94
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedOctober 25, 1920
StatusPublished

This text of 111 A. 410 (Thorne v. F. C. Johnson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thorne v. F. C. Johnson Co., 111 A. 410, 119 Me. 598, 1920 Me. LEXIS 94 (Me. 1920).

Opinion

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while in the employment of the defendant in its business of coal and [599]*599wood dealer. The latter was not an assenting employer within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and regularly employed more than five men in the same business in which plaintiff was employed. The only issue, therefore, was the alleged negligence of defendant.

Hinckley & Hinckley, for plaintiff. Howard Davies, and Joseph E. F. Connolly, for defendant.

It is the opinion of the court, after a careful examination of the evidence, that the jury were fully justified in returning a verdict for the plaintiff. Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 A. 410, 119 Me. 598, 1920 Me. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thorne-v-f-c-johnson-co-me-1920.