Thorne-El v. North Carolina
This text of 446 F. App'x 578 (Thorne-El v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
T. Thorne-El appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. Because Thorne-El may amend his complaint to cure the defects identified by the district court, the dismiss[579]*579al order is interlocutory and not appeal-able. See Chao v. Rivendell Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir.2005); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
446 F. App'x 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thorne-el-v-north-carolina-ca4-2011.