Thorndike v. Bordman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Thorndike v. Bordman

23 Mass. 375

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1828

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Mass. 375 (Thorndike v. Bordman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thorndike v. Bordman, 23 Mass. 375 (Mass. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

Assumpsit on a policy of insurance. The plaintiff, who was the prevailing party, sent to the Isle of France a commission to take evidence. The depositions of five witnesses were taken under the commission, and triplicate copies were sent to the plaintiff by different vessels. The expenses for executing the commission were 1431 dollars ; but the Cov.rt, in the exercise of their discretion, allowed the plaintiff to tax for them in his bill of costs, only the sum of 400 doJars,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assumpsit on a policy of insurance. The plaintiff, who was the prevailing party, sent to the Isle of France a commission to take evidence. The depositions of five witnesses were taken under the commission, and triplicate copies were sent to the plaintiff by different vessels. The expenses for executing the commission were 1431 dollars ; but the Cov.rt, in the exercise of their discretion, allowed the plaintiff to tax for them in his bill of costs, only the sum of 400 doJars,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Mass. 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thorndike-v-bordman-mass-1828.