Thorn v. Wilmorite, Inc.
This text of 281 A.D.2d 981 (Thorn v. Wilmorite, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of third-party defendant, K-Mart Corporation (K-Mart), for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint. There are triable issues of fact concerning whether the stacking of the tables constituted a dangerous condition (see, Hanley v Affronti, 278 AD2d 868; Vanderwater v Sears, 277 AD2d 1056), whether the accident occurred on premises owned, occupied, controlled or specially used by K-Mart (see, Siracuse v Race Off. Equip. Co., 278 AD2d 894; Brown v Congel, 241 AD2d 880, 881), and whether K-Mart affirmatively created the allegedly dangerous condition or had actual or constructive notice of it (see, Whyte v Whyte, 259 AD2d 1009, 1009-1010; Tenebruso v Toys “R” Us — NYTEX, 256 AD2d 1236, 1237; DiFusco v Wal-Mart Discount Cities, 255 AD2d 937, 937-938). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Major, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt and Burns, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D.2d 981, 722 N.Y.S.2d 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thorn-v-wilmorite-inc-nyappdiv-2001.