Thorn v. State
This text of 98 So. 2d 859 (Thorn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The general way to accuse a man of a felony is by indictment, Amendment XXXVII, Constitution, which replaced Section 8 thereof. To be an indictment, the accusation must be a writing “presented” by a grand jury. Code 1940, T. 15, § 228, McGee Crim.Proc. in Alabama, pp. 87 and 88. Being formulary acts,, its mode of presentment and its indorsement as a true bill prescribed by law (Code 1940, T. 15, § 250, and T. 30, § 89) are mandatory, McMullen v. State, 17 Ala.App. 504, 86 So. 175; Roan v. State, 225 Ala. 428, 143 So. 454 (dictum).
The purported indictment in the record here is only an accusation of assault with intent to murder subscribed by the solicitor without the indorsement “a true bill,” and for the want thereof does not support the judgment, Gould v. State, 29 Ala.App. 57, 191 So. 402, see also Dowdy v. State, 24 Ala.App. 333, 134 So. 896, for a list of other cases. 30 A.L.R. 721 notes that our view 'Conforms to that held in most states.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 So. 2d 859, 39 Ala. App. 227, 1957 Ala. App. LEXIS 59, 1957 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thorn-v-state-alactapp-1957.