Thorn v. Eastern Mausoleum Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thorn v. Eastern Mausoleum Co.

164 A.D. 967, 149 N.Y.S. 1114

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 164 A.D. 967 (Thorn v. Eastern Mausoleum Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thorn v. Eastern Mausoleum Co., 164 A.D. 967, 149 N.Y.S. 1114 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten doHars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten [968]*968dollars costs. Held, that the moving papers do not show that the exami- . nation is necessary to frame a complaint, or that the testimony of the persons to be examined is material and necessary in the prosecution of .the action, issue not having been joined. (See Lane v. Fenn, 123 App. Div. 914.) All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten doHars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten [968]*968dollars costs. Held, that the moving papers do not show that the exami- . nation is necessary to frame a complaint, or that the testimony of the persons to be examined is material and necessary in the prosecution of .the action, issue not having been joined. (See Lane v. Fenn, 123 App. Div. 914.) All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 A.D. 967, 149 N.Y.S. 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thorn-v-eastern-mausoleum-co-nyappdiv-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack