Thor Eckert & Co. v. Routsis
This text of 8 A.D.2d 793 (Thor Eckert & Co. v. Routsis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order so far as appealed from unanimously affirmed, without costs. In addition to the defects in the pleading indicated by Special Term, we call attention to the fact that paragraph 29 merely alleges conclusions. Nor does the pleading state that the defendant relied upon the representations allegedly made by the plaintiff. A comparison of paragraphs 25 and 29 indicates that no consummated joint venture, upon which the defendant relied, or which induced him to change his position, or caused him to suffer a loss, is pleaded. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.2d 793, 188 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7923, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thor-eckert-co-v-routsis-nyappdiv-1959.