Thomson v. Spradley

3 S.C.L. 284
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedNovember 15, 1803
StatusPublished

This text of 3 S.C.L. 284 (Thomson v. Spradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomson v. Spradley, 3 S.C.L. 284 (S.C. 1803).

Opinion

The court, after hearing argument by Rlanding, in support of a motion to reverse the decision oí the district court, and Falconer, against it, determined that the same should be reversed; principally, on the ground, that Johnson. J., who presided in the district court when the original entry was made, declared, that if he had understood such entry was intended to lie made in the court of common pleas, he would not have suffered it to he made there. The court intimated no opinion upon any of the points discussed in argument, as to the right of the common bail .surrender, or relative to the mode of entering special bail, and surrendering, pursuant to Act of Assembly ; but said; that all questions of this kind, would be open for investigation, upon the trial of the sci. jet.

[286]*286Present, Gr.mke, Watiiss, Johnson, Trezevant, vard, Justices ; Bay, J., absent. and Bri?.

Decision of the district court reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 S.C.L. 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomson-v-spradley-sc-1803.