Thomson v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
This text of 167 Cal. 795 (Thomson v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The cause of action in this case was one to recover damages for personal injuries received in the same collision referred to in the case of Housel v. Pacific Electric Railway Co. (L. A. No. 3070), ante, p. 245, [139 Pac. 73], this day decided. Judgment went for the defendant and the plaintiff appeals from such judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The questions presented are the same as those presented in Housel v. Pacific Electric Railway Co., ante, p. 245, [139 Pac. 73], and it was stipulated that the cause should be submitted upon the same record and briefs as those used in the Housel ease and that whatever judgment was rendered in the latter case should also be determinative of the appeal herein.
The judgment and order appealed from are reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 Cal. 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomson-v-pacific-electric-railway-co-cal-1914.