Thomson v. New York Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thomson v. New York Trust Co.

263 A.D. 941, 33 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7475

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 13, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 941 (Thomson v. New York Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomson v. New York Trust Co., 263 A.D. 941, 33 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7475 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by granting examination concerning items 9, 11 and 15 of plaintiff’s notice of motion, without prejudice to an examination of C. J. Morrison and Florence Sterling after the conclusion of the examination of R. G. Forbes; and by requiring the production of defendant’s books and papers pursuant to section 296 of the Civil Practice Act, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. (Zeltner v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 220 App. Div. 21.) The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by granting examination concerning items 9, 11 and 15 of plaintiff’s notice of motion, without prejudice to an examination of C. J. Morrison and Florence Sterling after the conclusion of the examination of R. G. Forbes; and by requiring the production of defendant’s books and papers pursuant to section 296 of the Civil Practice Act, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. (Zeltner v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 220 App. Div. 21.) The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 941, 33 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomson-v-new-york-trust-co-nyappdiv-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack