Thomson v. Livingston

The Superior Court of New York City

Thomson v. Livingston

6 Sandf. 539

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided April 19, 1851·Published

Opinion

Oaklet, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court, affirming the decision of the referee and the judgment at the special term, on the grounds stated in the syllabus of the case. T^he Chief Justice’s opinion was oral, and accidentally there was no note of it taken when it was delivered. The argument which led the court to the conclusion adopted, is contained in substance in the points of the plaintiff’s counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oaklet, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court, affirming the decision of the referee and the judgment at the special term, on the grounds stated in the syllabus of the case. T^he Chief Justice’s opinion was oral, and accidentally there was no note of it taken when it was delivered. The argument which led the court to the conclusion adopted, is contained in substance in the points of the plaintiff’s counsel.

Thomson v. Livingston, 6 Sandf. 539 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1851).

Pincite

6 Sandf. 539 (Thomson v. Livingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.