Thomson v. Church

1 Kirby 212
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1787
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Kirby 212 (Thomson v. Church) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomson v. Church, 1 Kirby 212 (Colo. Ct. App. 1787).

Opinion

By the whole Count.

Tbe motion is insufficient.— Tbe jury have, upon their oaths, found tbe defendant guilty; [213]*213and tliougb they may Lave misapprehended tlxe consequence of their verdict, and have been thereby the more readily induced to agree to it — it shall, nevertheless, be intended, in support of the verdict, and to avoid an implication, that the jury have violated their oaths- — -that they found the facts according to the evidence before them, and the real conviction of their minds.

As to the second exception — The insignificance of the damages — They were discretionary with the jury; and from the particular circumstances of the case, the smallest damages may have well been presumed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Kirby 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomson-v-church-connsuperct-1787.