Thomson & Taylor Spice Co. v. I. Lanski & Son Scrap Iron Co.

209 Ill. App. 331, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 621
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJanuary 28, 1918
DocketGen. No. 23,966
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 209 Ill. App. 331 (Thomson & Taylor Spice Co. v. I. Lanski & Son Scrap Iron Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thomson & Taylor Spice Co. v. I. Lanski & Son Scrap Iron Co., 209 Ill. App. 331, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 621 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Injunction," § 158*—what is pujóse of preliminary injunction. The purpose of a preliminary injunction is to preserve the status of the parties until the court can determine the merits of the controversy, and it cannot be used for the .purpose of compelling one to undo what he has already done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Theus v. Young
53 N.E.2d 298 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1944)
City of Springfield v. North Fork Outlet Drainage District
249 Ill. App. 133 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1928)
Utterback v. Estill
224 Ill. App. 151 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1922)
Dobrinsky v. Boylan
222 Ill. App. 494 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 Ill. App. 331, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomson-taylor-spice-co-v-i-lanski-son-scrap-iron-co-illappct-1918.