Thomson & Taylor Spice Co. v. I. Lanski & Son Scrap Iron Co.

209 Ill. App. 331, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 621
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided January 28, 1918·No. Gen. No. 23,966·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Injunction," § 158*—what is pujóse of preliminary injunction. The purpose of a preliminary injunction is to preserve the status of the parties until the court can determine the merits of the controversy, and it cannot be used for the .purpose of compelling one to undo what he has already done.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thomson & Taylor Spice Co. v. I. Lanski & Son Scrap Iron Co., 209 Ill. App. 331, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 621 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

209 Ill. App. 331 (Thomson & Taylor Spice Co. v. I. Lanski & Son Scrap Iron Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Theus v. Young
53 N.E.2d 298 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1944)
City of Springfield v. North Fork Outlet Drainage District
249 Ill. App. 133 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1928)
Utterback v. Estill
224 Ill. App. 151 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1922)
Dobrinsky v. Boylan
222 Ill. App. 494 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1921)