Thomson Licensing Sas v. International Trade Commission

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

THOMSON LICENSING SAS AND THOMSON LICENSING, LLC, Appellants,

V.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee,

AND

QISDA CORPORATION, QISDA AMERICA C()RPORATION, QISDA (SUZH()U) CO., LTD., BENQ CORPORATION, BENQ AMERICA CORPORATION, AND BENQ LATIN AMERICA CORPORATION,

Interl)enors,

AND

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATI()N OF AMERICA,

Interz)enors,

AND

CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION, INNOLUX CORPORATION, AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC.,

Interz)enors.

THOMASON LICENSING SAS V. ITC 2

2012-1536

On appeal from the United States International Trade Comrnission in lnvestigation Nos. 337-TA-741 and 337-TA- 749.

ON MOTION

()RDER

Upon consideration of Qisda Corporation, Qisda Arnerica Corporation, Qisda (Suzliou) Co., Ltd., Benq Corporation, Benq Arnerica Corporation, Benq Latin Amei'ica Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation of Arnerica, and Chirnei lnnolux Corporation, InnoluX Corporation, and Chi l\/[ei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.’s unopposed motions for leave to intervene,

I'i‘ Is ORDF.RED THAT:

The motions for leave to intervene are granted The revised official caption is reflected above.

FoR THE CoURT

/s/ J an Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

F|LED APPEALS Fon u'&r$icr]ausperir)€eiz\\_csi>.cu\r

SEP 14 ZU'&Z

JAN HOHBAL¥ CLERK

cc: John C. O’Quinn , Esq. Steven P. Hollman, Esq. Ron E. Shulinan, Esq. Frank H. l\/lorgan, Esq. Jia Chen, Esq.

s24