Thomson Licensing SA v. Beery

Federal Circuit

Thomson Licensing SA v. Beery

180 F. App'x 931

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedApril 27, 2006

DocketNo. 2005-1459

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 180 F. App'x 931 (Thomson Licensing SA v. Beery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomson Licensing SA v. Beery, 180 F. App'x 931 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Jack Beery moves to dismiss Licensing SA’s appeal (USDC for SD Ohio # 3:02-CV-311) as moot, due to settlement. Thomson Licensing SA has not responded.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The court’s October 19, 2005 order dismissing this appeal is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the appeal is reinstated to allow the present dismissal.

(2) Jack Beery’s motion to dismiss is granted.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

(4) All other pending motions and petitions are denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI