Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. H. W. Johns Manuf'g Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. H. W. Johns Manuf'g Co.

78 F. 364, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3039

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJune 8, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 78 F. 364 (Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. H. W. Johns Manuf'g Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. H. W. Johns Manuf'g Co., 78 F. 364, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3039 (circtsdny 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The complainant may take injunction restraining the making or sale of any trolley frog or switch devised oí* intended to be used in infringement of such claims of the patent sued upon as were sustained by the court of appeals. It is not intended, however, to enjoin against the sale of trolley frogs or switches by way of replacement of broken frogs or switches, or such as are worn out by use, or of substitution for trolley frogs or switches previously sold by the owner of the patent to purchasers from it. Defendants, however, must determine, at their peril, whether the purchaser buys to use for infringement, or only for legitimate repair; but this permission to repair does not give authority to reconstruct or rebuild a combination which has been sold by the owner of 'the patent. Injunction may run against the officers as well as the corporation defendant. Possibly, under the stimulus of an apprehended prosecution for contempt, they may familiarize themselves with the kind of goods their company is publicly advertising for sale, and thus infringement may be more satisfactorily checked than it would otherwise be.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The complainant may take injunction restraining the making or sale of any trolley frog or switch devised oí* intended to be used in infringement of such claims of the patent sued upon as were sustained by the court of appeals. It is not intended, however, to enjoin against the sale of trolley frogs or switches by way of replacement of broken frogs or switches, or such as are worn out by use, or of substitution for trolley frogs or switches previously sold by the owner of the patent to purchasers from it. Defendants, however, must determine, at their peril, whether the purchaser buys to use for infringement, or only for legitimate repair; but this permission to repair does not give authority to reconstruct or rebuild a combination which has been sold by the owner of 'the patent. Injunction may run against the officers as well as the corporation defendant. Possibly, under the stimulus of an apprehended prosecution for contempt, they may familiarize themselves with the kind of goods their company is publicly advertising for sale, and thus infringement may be more satisfactorily checked than it would otherwise be.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 F. 364, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 3039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thomson-houston-electric-co-v-h-w-johns-manufg-co-circtsdny-1896.