Thompson's Lessee v. Watson

Supreme Court of Delaware

Thompson's Lessee v. Watson

2 Del. Cas. 514, 1819 Del. LEXIS 22

Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided June 17, 1819·Published

Opinion

On the application and consent of Mr. Reed for the plaintiff in error and Mr. Vandyke and Mr. Rogers, counsel for the defendant in error, the Court allows this cause to be continued, on account of the length of the session of the Court this term and the quantity of other important business before the Court. But it is understood that the consent of counsel for the continuance shall not be, and is not, a sufficient reason for a continuance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the application and consent of Mr. Reed for the plaintiff in error and Mr. Vandyke and Mr. Rogers, counsel for the defendant in error, the Court allows this cause to be continued, on account of the length of the session of the Court this term and the quantity of other important business before the Court. But it is understood that the consent of counsel for the continuance shall not be, and is not, a sufficient reason for a continuance.

Thompson's Lessee v. Watson, 2 Del. Cas. 514, 1819 Del. LEXIS 22 (Del. 1819).

Pincite

2 Del. Cas. 514 (Thompson's Lessee v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.