Thompson's Estate

10 Pa. D. & C. 69, 1928 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 363
Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County·Decided January 20, 1928·No. No. 2459·Published

Opinion

Henderson, J.,

A careful examination of the record and of the briefs convinces us that the action of the Auditing Judge is correct and for the reasons given by him. Section 15 (b) of the Wills Act of June 7, 1917, P. L. 403, is remedial and should be liberally construed.

The doctrine of Minter’s Appeal, 40 Pa. 111, is followed in many other jurisdictions: See 3 Am. Law Reps. 1682.

We must presume that the testator knew the law, and, hence, if he had a doubt as to whether his nephew, John Lynn, survived the execution of the [71]*71will, he knew that at least the nephew’s children would be substituted under this doctrine.

The exceptions are dismissed and the adjudication is confirmed absolutely.

Lamorelle, P. J., was absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson's Estate, 10 Pa. D. & C. 69, 1928 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 363 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1928).

10 Pa. D. & C. 69 (Thompson's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Minter's Appeal
40 Pa. 111 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1861)