Thompson & Wilkes v. Mallory Brothers & Co.

33 S.E. 986, 108 Ga. 797, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 435
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 24, 1899·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

1. Upon the trial of an issue of partnership or no partnership, the declarations of one of the alleged partners, whether oral or written, are inadmissible against another of them to prove the fact of partnership.

2. If upon the trial of an action against an alleged partnership the existence of the firm is established by competent evidence, then admissions against interest made by one of the partners within the scope of the business of the partnership are admissible to show liability upon its part.

3. At the trial now under review the court erred in not following the principles above announced, and consequently there should be another hearing. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring. Complaint. Before Judge Gamble. Tattnall superior court. October term, 1898. Isaiah Beasley and James K. Hines, for plaintiffs in error. J. V. Kelley and Hall & Wimberly, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson & Wilkes v. Mallory Brothers & Co., 33 S.E. 986, 108 Ga. 797, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 435 (Ga. 1899).

33 S.E. 986 (Thompson & Wilkes v. Mallory Brothers & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leidy v. Gould
140 S.E. 400 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)