Thompson v. Young
2 Ohio 334
Opinion
The authorities adduced by the defendants are conclusive that the securities were not bound for any defalcation that took place after the expiration of the first charter. And we hold them to be in accordance with the soundest principles of justice.
It is equally clear that the defendants can not be concluded by an adjudication in a case where they were not parties. The bill must be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. Young, 2 Ohio 334 (Ohio 1826).
2 Ohio 334 (Thompson v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rany v. Governor
4 Blackf. 2 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1835)