Thompson v. Wright

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Thompson v. Wright

14 N.J.L. 38

DecidedMay 15, 1833

StatusPublished

This text of 14 N.J.L. 38 (Thompson v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Wright, 14 N.J.L. 38 (N.J. 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The Court of Common Pleas erred. The transcript of the justice may fairly and grammatically read, that the appellant asked for, or demanded an appeal at the time of the rendition of the judgment, and afterwards on the 4th of June, 1831, complied with the requisites of the law, by tendering an appeal bond. If the words previous to the 4th of June, were stricken out, still the record would be a sufficient compliance with the law. The tendering of an appeal bond executed according to law is a demand of an appeal.

Let a mandamus be issued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The Court of Common Pleas erred. The transcript of the justice may fairly and grammatically read, that the appellant asked for, or demanded an appeal at the time of the rendition of the judgment, and afterwards on the 4th of June, 1831, complied with the requisites of the law, by tendering an appeal bond. If the words previous to the 4th of June, were stricken out, still the record would be a sufficient compliance with the law. The tendering of an appeal bond executed according to law is a demand of an appeal.

Let a mandamus be issued.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 N.J.L. 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-wright-nj-1833.