Thompson v. Wright
185 S.E. 341, 182 Ga. 380, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 371
Opinion
The transaction between a husband and his wife, whereby she gave her note for the purchase-price of land, was not a sale by the wife of any part of her estate. Such transaction did not require an order of the superior court approving* it, and the note is not void. This court adopts the reasoning in the dissenting* opinion filed in this case in the Court of Appeals. 51 Ga. App. 817, 820 (181 S. E. 875).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. Wright, 185 S.E. 341, 182 Ga. 380, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 371 (Ga. 1936).
185 S.E. 341 (Thompson v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clements v. Hollingsworth
44 S.E.2d 381 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Pierce v. Cheves-Green Co.
12 S.E.2d 476 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Thompson v. Wright
187 S.E. 311 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)