Thompson v. Wright

Supreme Court of Georgia

Thompson v. Wright

185 S.E. 341, 182 Ga. 380, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 371

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 20, 1936

DocketNo. 11122

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 185 S.E. 341 (Thompson v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Wright, 185 S.E. 341, 182 Ga. 380, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 371 (Ga. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cubiam.

The transaction between a husband and his wife, whereby she gave her note for the purchase-price of land, was not a sale by the wife of any part of her estate. Such transaction did not require an order of the superior court approving* it, and the note is not void. This court adopts the reasoning in the dissenting* opinion filed in this case in the Court of Appeals. 51 Ga. App. 817, 820 (181 S. E. 875).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cubiam.

The transaction between a husband and his wife, whereby she gave her note for the purchase-price of land, was not a sale by the wife of any part of her estate. Such transaction did not require an order of the superior court approving* it, and the note is not void. This court adopts the reasoning in the dissenting* opinion filed in this case in the Court of Appeals. 51 Ga. App. 817, 820 (181 S. E. 875).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, P. J., who dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 S.E. 341, 182 Ga. 380, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-wright-ga-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack