Thompson v. Whittier

365 U.S. 465, 81 S. Ct. 712, 5 L. Ed. 2d 704, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1651
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 27, 1961·No. 500·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted. The case does not arise under 28 U. S. C. § 2282, requiring the convening of a three-judge court. See I. L. G. W. U. v. Donnelly Garment Co., 304 U. S. 243. Therefore it cannot be directly brought here for review under 28 U. S. C. § 1253, and the appeal must be dismissed. Appellant is free to pursue his perfected appeal in the Court of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Whittier, 365 U.S. 465, 81 S. Ct. 712, 5 L. Ed. 2d 704, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1651 (1961).

365 U.S. 465 (Thompson v. Whittier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heller v. United States
776 F.2d 92 (Third Circuit, 1985)
States Marine Lines, Inc. v. Shultz
359 F. Supp. 512 (D. South Carolina, 1973)
Vito Giacalone v. William Lucas, Sheriff
445 F.2d 1238 (Sixth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Eugene Billy James
443 F.2d 348 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Arthur J. Porth
426 F.2d 519 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)
Di Silvestro v. United States
268 F. Supp. 516 (E.D. New York, 1966)
Allen v. Hoffius
36 F.R.D. 11 (W.D. Michigan, 1964)
Rusk v. Cort
369 U.S. 367 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Kesler v. Department of Public Safety of Utah
369 U.S. 153 (Supreme Court, 1962)