Thompson v. Whittier

Supreme Court

Thompson v. Whittier

365 U.S. 465, 81 S. Ct. 712, 5 L. Ed. 2d 704, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1651

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 27, 1961

Docket500

StatusPublished

Cited by20 cases

This text of 365 U.S. 465 (Thompson v. Whittier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Whittier, 365 U.S. 465, 81 S. Ct. 712, 5 L. Ed. 2d 704, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1651 (1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted. The case does not arise under 28 U. S. C. § 2282, requiring the convening of a three-judge court. See I. L. G. W. U. v. Donnelly Garment Co., 304 U. S. 243. Therefore it cannot be directly brought here for review under 28 U. S. C. § 1253, and the appeal must be dismissed. Appellant is free to pursue his perfected appeal in the Court of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted. The case does not arise under 28 U. S. C. § 2282, requiring the convening of a three-judge court. See I. L. G. W. U. v. Donnelly Garment Co., 304 U. S. 243. Therefore it cannot be directly brought here for review under 28 U. S. C. § 1253, and the appeal must be dismissed. Appellant is free to pursue his perfected appeal in the Court of Appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 U.S. 465, 81 S. Ct. 712, 5 L. Ed. 2d 704, 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-whittier-scotus-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack