Thompson v. Washington Mutual
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 STEVEN THOMPSON, et al., ) Case No.: C 09-5385 PVT ) 13 Plaintiffs, ) FURTHER ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ ) APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA 14 v. ) PAUPERIS ) 15 WASHINGTON MUTUAL, et al., ) ) 16 Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) 17 18 On November 24, 2009, this court issued an order granting Plaintiffs’ application to proceed 19 in forma pauperis. On June 23, 2010, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint which adds additional 20 Defendants. Therefore, 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Marshall for the Northern District of 22 California shall serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the Amended Complaint, any 23 amendments, scheduling orders, attachments and this order upon the three newly added Defendants: 24 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, JP Morgan Chase Bank, and US Bank. 25 Dated: June 24, 2010 26 PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL 27 United States Magistrate Judge 28
ORDER, page 1 1 2 copies mailed on 6/25/10 to: 3 Steven Thompson Post Office Box 92214 4 Henderson, NV 89009 5 Aster Kifle-Thompson Post Office Box 92214 6 Henderson, NV 89009 7 /s/ Donna Kirchner for 8 MARTHA BROWN Courtroom Deputy 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER, page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. Washington Mutual (Thompson v. Washington Mutual) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.