Thompson v. Warder

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Thompson v. Warder

4 Yeates 336

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 15, 1806

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 4 Yeates 336 (Thompson v. Warder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Warder, 4 Yeates 336 (Pa. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

The court declared that they saw no difficulty in granting the motion, though against the consent of the adverse party, in case of an informality. The practice had obtained in other cases, and [337]*337evidently conduced to justice. The parties at length mutually agreed, that the defendant should be heard on a stated day by the same referees, to make his objections to the sum found due.

Cited in 4 Watts 65 to shew that for the purpose of correcting an informality or a clerical mistake in the award the court has sometimes recommitted it to the arbitrators without the consent of the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court declared that they saw no difficulty in granting the motion, though against the consent of the adverse party, in case of an informality. The practice had obtained in other cases, and [337]*337evidently conduced to justice. The parties at length mutually agreed, that the defendant should be heard on a stated day by the same referees, to make his objections to the sum found due.

Cited in 4 Watts 65 to shew that for the purpose of correcting an informality or a clerical mistake in the award the court has sometimes recommitted it to the arbitrators without the consent of the parties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Yeates 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-warder-pa-1806.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack