Thompson v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

237 Md. 655
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided March 5, 1965·No. App. No. 111·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER Curiam.

This is petitioner’s second application for leave to appeal from a denial of relief under the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act. This Court’s prior denial adopted the opinion of Judge Loveless below. Thompson v. Warden, 229 Md. 641, 184 A. 2d 35 (1962).

In denying this second application below, Judge Bowen, in a thorough opinion, reviewed petitioner’s prior petition before Judge Loveless, and the proceedings in the federal court under habeas corpus, and found that all points raised were previously raised and decided under petitioner’s first post conviction petition.

[656]*656In any event, petitioner’s present application does not comply with Maryland Rule BK 46 b which requires a statement of reasons and must be dismissed on that ground. Dofflemyer v. Director, 237 Md. 639.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 237 Md. 655 (Md. 1965).

237 Md. 655 (Thompson v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. Warden
207 A.2d 498 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1965)