Thompson v. Warden

120 A.2d 200, 209 Md. 628
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedOctober 21, 2001
Docket[H.C. No. 21, October Term, 1955.]
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 A.2d 200 (Thompson v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Warden, 120 A.2d 200, 209 Md. 628 (Md. 2001).

Opinion

209 Md. 628 (1956)
120 A.2d 200

THOMPSON
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

[H.C. No. 21, October Term, 1955.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 9, 1956.

*629 Before BRUNE, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and HAMMOND, JJ.

HAMMOND, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this application for leave to appeal from the denial of the writ of habeas corpus, petitioner, who was found not guilty of larceny but guilty of receiving stolen goods, and sentenced to five years in the House of Correction, contends that it was error to admit the testimony of the wife of his accomplice, on the ground that she was in fact also an accomplice. He complains generally of the inadmissibility of other evidence which helped to convict him. We have held repeatedly that attacks on the competency, admissibility or sufficiency of the evidence cannot serve as the basis for the writ of habeas corpus. Canter v. Warden, 207 Md. 616; Smith v. Warden, 207 Md. 628; Medley v. Warden, 207 Md. 634; Cummings v. Warden, 206 Md. 637; Stokes v. Warden, 205 Md. 629.

Application denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Snyder v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
133 A.2d 924 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 A.2d 200, 209 Md. 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-warden-md-2001.