Thompson v. Warden

120 A.2d 200, 209 Md. 628
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 21, 2001·No. [H.C. No. 21, October Term, 1955.]·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

209 Md. 628 (1956)
120 A.2d 200

THOMPSON
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

[H.C. No. 21, October Term, 1955.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 9, 1956.

*629 Before BRUNE, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and HAMMOND, JJ.

HAMMOND, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this application for leave to appeal from the denial of the writ of habeas corpus, petitioner, who was found not guilty of larceny but guilty of receiving stolen goods, and sentenced to five years in the House of Correction, contends that it was error to admit the testimony of the wife of his accomplice, on the ground that she was in fact also an accomplice. He complains generally of the inadmissibility of other evidence which helped to convict him. We have held repeatedly that attacks on the competency, admissibility or sufficiency of the evidence cannot serve as the basis for the writ of habeas corpus. Canter v. Warden, 207 Md. 616; Smith v. Warden, 207 Md. 628; Medley v. Warden, 207 Md. 634; Cummings v. Warden, 206 Md. 637; Stokes v. Warden, 205 Md. 629.

Application denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Warden, 120 A.2d 200, 209 Md. 628 (Md. 2001).

120 A.2d 200 (Thompson v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snyder v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
133 A.2d 924 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)