Thompson v. Thompson

255 A.D. 814, 7 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5419
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 28, 1938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to annul a marriage on the ground of fraudulent representations, judgment in favor of defendant reversed on the law, without costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint, without costs. Conclusions of law disapproved; new conclusions will be made. The facts as found, to which no exception is taken, provide an adequate basis for concluding that plaintiff is entitled to a decree. (Shonfeld v. Shonfeld, 260 N. Y. 477; di Lorenzo v. di Lorenzo, 174 id. 467.) Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents [815]*815on the ground that the record is incomplete and a determination cannot be made thereon. — Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Thompson, 255 A.D. 814, 7 N.Y.S.2d 280, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5419 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

255 A.D. 814 (Thompson v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thurber v. Thurber
186 Misc. 1022 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)