Thompson v. Thompson

212 N.W. 878, 237 Mich. 637, 1927 Mich. LEXIS 577
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 229 Mich. 526
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 1, 1927·No. Docket No. 51.·Published

Opinion

Sharpe, C. J.

The plaintiff and defendant were married in 1898, and lived together until March 13, 1925, when plaintiff left their home in Detroit, and has since resided with their son and only child, in South Haven. In her bill of complaint for divorce she charges extreme cruelty. There are several averments of personal violence. The trial court found that the charges were sustained by the proofs. He awarded the plaintiff as permanent alimony a house and lot, owned by them by the entireties, in Detroit, and the furniture in the house, of the value of $8,450, and the sum of $5,050, to be paid her by defendant within 60 days from the date of the decree. Defendant appeals.

He insists that no sufficient cause for divorce was proven. The record satisfies us that the proofs justified the finding of the trial court. They together owned property of the value of nearly! $30,000, consisting of the house and lot above referred to- and certain contracts for real estate in Pontiac and South Haven, which appear to be worth their face value. Certain stocks of uncertain value are to be divided equally between them. The plaintiff owned some property at the time of their marriage and aided in the accumulation of what they now have. We find no reason for disturbing the allowance made to her.

The decree is affirmed, with costs to appellee.

Snow, Steere, Fellows, Wiest, Clark, and McDonald, JJ., concurred. Bird, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Thompson, 212 N.W. 878, 237 Mich. 637, 1927 Mich. LEXIS 577 (Mich. 1927).

212 N.W. 878 (Thompson v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.