Thompson v. Thompson

45 S.E. 439, 118 Ga. 543, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 612
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 13, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 45 S.E. 439 (Thompson v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Thompson, 45 S.E. 439, 118 Ga. 543, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 612 (Ga. 1903).

Opinion

Pish, P. J.

1. Plaintiff’s action was to recover land alleged to have been given, in parol, by defendant to his son, plaintiff’s deceased husband. Defendant denied the gift. Upon the trial the evidence as to the gift was conflicting, that for the' plaintiff consisting of alleged admissions of the defendant. The . court permitted a witness to testify for plaintiff, over defendant’s objection, that he was called upon by defendant to witness a deed from defendent to. [544]*544his son for the land in question. Held, that such testimony was irrelevant, and was calculated to hurt defendant’s contention in the minds of the jury, and its admission was cause for a new trial, especially in so close a case as this. ■

Argued July 15, — Decided August 13, 1903. Equitable petition. Before Judge Evans. ■ Tattnall superior court. December 15, 1902. P. W. Williams and James K. Hines, for plaintiff in error in the main bill of exceptions. W. T. Burhhalter, contra.

2. Where a term order was granted directing that a pending motion for a new trial be heard on a given date in vacation, and providing ‘ ‘ that movant have until the hearingjof this motion, whenever that is, to prepare and have approved a brief of the evidence in said case,” and where upon the date so named a brief of evidence was presented to and approved by the judge and he thereupon ordered the same filed, a motion made at the hearing, which was had on the day named in the order', to dismiss the motion for a new trial, upon the ground that no brief of evidence had been filed as required by law, was prbperly overruled. Hightower v. George, 102 Ga. 540; Johnson v. Grantham, 110 Ga. 281.

Judgment reversed. On cross-bill, affirmed.

By five Justices.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Security Insurance v. Jackson
157 S.E. 93 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 S.E. 439, 118 Ga. 543, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-thompson-ga-1903.