Thompson v. Thompson

550 So. 2d 496, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2378, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5599, 1989 WL 118611
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1989·No. No. 88-1125·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order adjudicating appellant in contempt. See Kaylor v. Kaylor, 466 So.2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), rev. dismissed, 500 So.2d 530 (Fla.1987). However, because it is conceivable that the amount of periodic alimony awarded to ap-pellee could be affected by a decision of the Florida Supreme Court in Thompson v. Thompson, No. 74,419, we remand with direction to withhold enforcement of the contempt order, pending a decision therein. The husband’s obligations pursuant to the trial court’s final judgment are in no way altered by this decision.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Thompson, 550 So. 2d 496, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2378, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5599, 1989 WL 118611 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

550 So. 2d 496 (Thompson v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smellie v. Torres
570 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Mayes v. State
550 So. 2d 496 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)