Thompson v. Thompson

390 So. 2d 128, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17587
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 12, 1980
DocketNo. 79-2493
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 390 So. 2d 128 (Thompson v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Thompson, 390 So. 2d 128, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17587 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

BERANEK, Judge.

This is an appeal from a non-final order in a dissolution of marriage proceeding. The wife seeks review of the trial court’s order which is in the nature of a mandatory injunction. We conclude that reversible error has not been demonstrated. The trial court ordered certain steps taken to preserve the financial status quo of the parties. The trial court did not determine property rights. The order was in accordance with Yohem v. Yohem, 295 So.2d 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974).

The appellee/husband has moved for attorneys’ fees on appeal. This motion is granted to the extent that the cause is remanded to the trial court for consideration of appropriate evidence in this regard.

AFFIRMED.

MOORE and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Fields
390 So. 2d 128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
390 So. 2d 128, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-thompson-fladistctapp-1980.