Thompson v. Thompson

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Thompson v. Thompson

1 S.C. Eq. 136

Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided June 15, 1787·Published

Opinion

On motion of Mr, Edward Rutledge, wiih the concur™ rence 0f ]y[r. Bay, ordered, that an issue be directed to ascertain the validity of a deed of gift, as mentioned in ^ie Mil of complaint iii this cause.

Afterwards (in December, 1787,) the bill was die-missed with costs; and it was ordered# that the verdict of the jury at Camden, proving the forgery of a deed of gift in bill mentioned, should be filed, and become of record In the Registry of this court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On motion of Mr, Edward Rutledge, wiih the concur™ rence 0f ]y[r. Bay, ordered, that an issue be directed to ascertain the validity of a deed of gift, as mentioned in ^ie Mil of complaint iii this cause.

Afterwards (in December, 1787,) the bill was die-missed with costs; and it was ordered# that the verdict of the jury at Camden, proving the forgery of a deed of gift in bill mentioned, should be filed, and become of record In the Registry of this court

Thompson v. Thompson, 1 S.C. Eq. 136 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1787).

Pincite

1 S.C. Eq. 136 (Thompson v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.