Thompson v. Thompson

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Thompson v. Thompson

1 S.C. Eq. 136

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedJune 15, 1787

StatusPublished

This text of 1 S.C. Eq. 136 (Thompson v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Thompson, 1 S.C. Eq. 136 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1787).

Pincite

Opinion

On motion of Mr, Edward Rutledge, wiih the concur™ rence 0f ]y[r. Bay, ordered, that an issue be directed to ascertain the validity of a deed of gift, as mentioned in ^ie Mil of complaint iii this cause.

Afterwards (in December, 1787,) the bill was die-missed with costs; and it was ordered# that the verdict of the jury at Camden, proving the forgery of a deed of gift in bill mentioned, should be filed, and become of record In the Registry of this court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On motion of Mr, Edward Rutledge, wiih the concur™ rence 0f ]y[r. Bay, ordered, that an issue be directed to ascertain the validity of a deed of gift, as mentioned in ^ie Mil of complaint iii this cause.

Afterwards (in December, 1787,) the bill was die-missed with costs; and it was ordered# that the verdict of the jury at Camden, proving the forgery of a deed of gift in bill mentioned, should be filed, and become of record In the Registry of this court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 S.C. Eq. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-thompson-ctchansc-1787.