Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Thompson v. . Tate

Thompson v. . Tate

5 N.C. 97
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 5, 1805
StatusPublished

This text of 5 N.C. 97 (Thompson v. . Tate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. . Tate, 5 N.C. 97 (N.C. 1805).

Opinion

From Hillsborough. Upon this question there can be no doubt: the vendor is clearly liable, and the rule for a new trial must be discharged.

Cited: McKinnon v. McIntosh, 98 N.C. 92; Wrenn v. Morgan, 148 N.C. 105. *Page 72

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKinnon v. . McIntosh
3 S.E. 840 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1887)
Wrenn v. . Morgan
61 S.E. 641 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 N.C. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-tate-nc-1805.