Thompson v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Companies, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Thompson v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Companies, Inc.

277 A.D.2d 48, 715 N.Y.S.2d 147, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11301

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 9, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 48 (Thompson v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Companies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Companies, Inc., 277 A.D.2d 48, 715 N.Y.S.2d 147, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11301 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, Jr., J.), entered September 8, 1999, which, in this action seeking damages for personal injuries resulting from a slip and fall on the floor of defendant’s supermarket, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly granted defendant’s motion since plaintiff failed to rebut defendant’s showing that it had no prior notice of the existence of the patch of spilled liquid upon which plaintiff allegedly fell (Fasolino v Charming Stores, 77 NY2d 847). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, Jr., J.), entered September 8, 1999, which, in this action seeking damages for personal injuries resulting from a slip and fall on the floor of defendant’s supermarket, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly granted defendant’s motion since plaintiff failed to rebut defendant’s showing that it had no prior notice of the existence of the patch of spilled liquid upon which plaintiff allegedly fell (Fasolino v Charming Stores, 77 NY2d 847). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Wallach, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 48, 715 N.Y.S.2d 147, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-stop-shop-supermarket-companies-inc-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack