Thompson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Thompson v. State

763 S.W.2d 430, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 52, 1989 WL 2196

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 18, 1989

DocketNo. 45-88

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 763 S.W.2d 430 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. State, 763 S.W.2d 430, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 52, 1989 WL 2196 (Tex. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury for manufacture of a controlled substance and punishment was assessed at 50 years confinement and a $50,000.00 fine. The conviction was affirmed on appeal. Thompson v. State, 741 S.W.2d 229 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1987). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review raising two grounds for review.

We agree with the Court of Appeals that none of the grounds raised requires reversal. As is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, however, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. See Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI